Risk appetite implies
certain business ability to actually measure risk level. Although there are relatively few
opportunities to really measure quantifiable risk in a consistent and
meaningful way.
Strategic Planning is
a process of enacting on opportunistic risk. Without good threat and
opportunity identification and analysis, then the strategic planning process is
all about defending your business position. The age-proven SWOT analysis
(Strengths Weaknesses, Opportunities, Treats) is a very common process to help
determine where value can be created in the organization rather than just
protecting value.
There is possibly different
scenario in which the identification of 'negative' risks unearths an
opportunity. But this requires the stakeholder to change their perspective
or framing on what they are observing. This is all a matter of
perspective, and when you are dealing with safety experts they tend to only
look at the downside of risk. Nonetheless, if you are talking to market risk
analysts or investors, they hunt for risk, risk valuable to them because within
risk is yield. From an operational standpoint, businesses often focus on
threats to the business plan to protect the value and achieve the objectives.
But from a strategic perspective, not only must you put in place strategies to
protect the value in the business, but value must be created and the company
must grow, and good opportunity assessment is vital in that regard. Once
the strategy is in place, then there is a focus on managing the threats that
may hinder business achieving the new objective.
Look only into a
negative prospective of risk is simple, but not optimal:
1). First of all, it’s more comfortable. To concentrate the
attention on the negative side of the coin means that you need just to think to
something which should prevent a possible problem or mitigate some impacts.
There is no proactive action and there is less chance to be wrong.
2). Second, it doesn’t need so much imagination. To concentrate on the negative side often means just to remember something already happened in the past and try to avoid it.
Looking into an optimistic prospective needs more effort,
2). Second, it doesn’t need so much imagination. To concentrate on the negative side often means just to remember something already happened in the past and try to avoid it.
Looking into an optimistic prospective needs more effort,
3). The optimal risk management is multi-dimensions of
planning that asks: "What can go wrong? And, what can I do about it?"
thinking about what can go wrong absolutely can lead to new opportunities. And
just because they may have come form the "dark side", they are
opportunities all the same.
There is nothing
wrong with re-framing, if you can re-frame the thinking and try to recover
positively from that uncertainty. More often, business is still
fundamentally looking at risk in a negative context but adapting that context
at point of analysis to identify the upside from a specific uncertainty one is
threatened with. Business have objective which may potentially benefits, but
whether that business strategy is successful or not in the future is uncertain
and achieve that objective might have negative outcomes which need to be
controlled. Even better business can turn negative outcomes into potential
future opportunities.
Risks are the matter
with probability to be occurred and impact level in specific areas. As long
as risks have been identified and agreed with stakeholder as per business need, then you can take place a risk models which effectively predict, optimize and consider a continual
and sustainable approach with multi-faceted perspectives, and specific threshold
for justifying opportunities and business outcome.
As part of implementing an ERM-Enterprise Risk Management system, companies should put in place a risk appetite system that goes beyond high level statements. You can then use the more granular risk appetite statements to monitor risk taking in the business, and business risk management executives shall point out situations where the business is taking either too much or too little risk with respect to the risk appetite.
As part of implementing an ERM-Enterprise Risk Management system, companies should put in place a risk appetite system that goes beyond high level statements. You can then use the more granular risk appetite statements to monitor risk taking in the business, and business risk management executives shall point out situations where the business is taking either too much or too little risk with respect to the risk appetite.
Therefore, the healthy level of your 'Risk Appetite' depends on how you can 'digiest' the risks, and identify the upside via re-framing the positive view from that uncertainty.
No comments:
Post a Comment