To navigate this quagmire of risk management, organizations need to adopt a cross-functional, strategic approach to risk management.
With the overwhelming growth of information and rapid change, risks are becoming increasingly interconnected, requiring a cross-functional approach to managing operational resilience. Major risks like economic issues, supply chain disruptions, climate change, and talent retention cut across corporate functions.
There is a need for strategic prioritization of resilience. Corporate leaders should view resilience as strategically important and a potential competitive advantage. Companies need to ensure they are resilient in the dynamic business environment and focus on long-term sustainability.
The gap in the perception of preparedness: There's often a gap between business executives' and risk management teams' understanding of organizational preparedness. Management needs to reach a common understanding of the full impact of key risks and the programs in place to address them.
Challenges in infrastructure operations: While tools exist for deploying changes at scale, there's a lack of standardized tooling and safety checks to ensure these changes are safe. Risks in production environments can still trigger outages due to a lack of effective safety or error-checking frameworks.
The human element in operational risk management: Remote work has introduced new risks, including burnout, diminished employee engagement, and reduced collaboration, which can impact a company's ability to respond to disruptions.
Organizational structure for risk management: There's debate about where responsibility for operational resilience should sit within an organization, with many believing it should be aligned with enterprise-wide functions like risk management or operations.
Economic constraints on safety tooling: Rapid changes in software and infrastructure make it economically challenging for organizations to maintain up-to-date safety tooling. Many organizations rely on reactive approaches or lower environments due to resource constraints.
Need for standardization: There's a call to standardize Safety Tooling and make it a first-class citizen in infrastructure deployment stacks, especially for mission-critical applications.
To navigate this quagmire in risk management, organizations need to adopt a cross-functional, strategic approach to risk management; close the gap between leadership and operational perceptions of risk preparedness; and invest in standardized safety tooling, especially for critical infrastructure. Address the human elements of resilience, particularly in remote work environments. Align responsibility for resilience with enterprise-wide functions. Balance economic constraints with the need for robust safety measures
Assuming that in any risk management program, all the known and potential risks would have been covered and managed, and over a period of time, the enterprise risk management would be making continuous improvement. These steps can help organizations better manage the complex, interconnected risks they face in today's business environment.
0 comments:
Post a Comment