Saturday, February 1, 2025

Principles in Governance

The "theory" of phenomena should always be open to interpretation and understanding of the theory should rightly be questioned when it fails to account for what actually happens.

The theory is developed based on continuous practice improvement. Improvement in practice can be achieved through many different means - self-reflection, sharing of experiences, comparison with a reference model (framework), and formal review by an external party.


These theories provide different lenses through which to understand governance, each focusing on distinct aspects such as individual decision-making, institutional roles, systemic interactions, or the influence of ideas and meanings. Key ethical theories in governance include:


Deontological Ethics: This theory emphasizes duty and the morality of actions based on adherence to rules or laws, rather than the consequences of those actions. Philosophers in deontological ethics, advocate for actions to be guided by universal moral laws, such as treating humanity as an end in itself and not merely as a means.


Utilitarianism: This consequentialist theory assesses the morality of actions based on their outcomes, specifically aiming to achieve the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Utilitarianism uses a consequentialist approach, judging actions based on their outcomes. 


Ethical Relativism: This theory suggests that moral beliefs and practices are culturally dependent and that there are no universal moral truths. Critics argue that ethical relativism can lead to tolerance of harmful practices if they are culturally accepted, and it challenges the ability to critique societal norms.


Deliberative Democracy: This theory emphasizes the role of reasoned discussion and fair procedures in achieving legitimate and consensual governance decisions. It focuses on creating a just political society through rational discourse and equal participation.


The "theory" of phenomena should always be open to interpretation and understanding of the theory should rightly be questioned when it fails to account for what actually happens. These theories provide different frameworks for understanding and evaluating ethical decision-making in governance, each with its own focus on rules, consequences, cultural context, or deliberative processes.


0 comments:

Post a Comment