Impartiality takes different forms across moral, legal, professional, and religious domains, but generally involves fair, unbiased treatment or judgment based on objective standards rather than personal preference or prejudice.
Formal vs. Moral Impartiality: Formal impartiality is a broad, neutral concept where certain considerations are excluded from influencing a decision. Moral impartiality is more specific, involving ideas of fairness, lack of bias/prejudice, and equal consideration of interests.
Impartiality in Different Contexts: Legal/Judicial: Judges and legal systems are expected to be impartial, basing decisions on objective criteria. Humanitarian: Organizations aim for impartiality by not discriminating based on nationality, race, gender, religion, etc. Professional roles: Certain roles require impartiality in performing duties.
Levels of Moral Impartiality: Impartial application of moral rules. Using impartial benevolence as a direct guide for decisions. Assessing first-order moral rules from an impartial standpoint
Impartiality vs. Partiality: Some argue morally admirable partiality exists. Others claim apparent partiality can be reduced to impartial standards
Components of Impartiality:
-Freedom from favoritism and bias
-Commitment to aiding all parties equally
-Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
-Basing decisions on objective criteria rather than improper preferences
Impartiality takes different forms across moral, legal, professional, and religious domains, but generally involves fair, unbiased treatment or judgment based on objective standards rather than personal preference or prejudice.
0 comments:
Post a Comment