Inquiry via Argumentative Understanding

 Advancing humanity involves a complex interplay of technological, social, and scientific developments that have historically driven human progress. 

The scientific inquiry of human nature - thinking, attitude, behavior- necessitates an approach that is interdisciplinary to drive changes. Argumentative understanding in humanity involves using argumentation as a fundamental method of judgment to interpret texts and acquire knowledge. This approach acknowledges that conclusions are relative and temporal, emphasizing dialogue and debate in understanding various perspectives.

Critical Thinking: Critical thinking involves deliberative reasoning and impartial scrutiny of information to solve problems. It includes breaking down problems, recognizing biases, collecting evidence, and adjusting one's thinking based on new information.

Rhetoric and Argumentation: Modern rhetoric has shifted its focus to the audience and the intention behind communication, viewing texts as embodiments of intention. Argumentation, in this context, is the basic method of judgment, influencing how individuals acquire knowledge and form opinions.

Philosophical Perspectives: Philosophically, argumentative understanding is linked to how individuals reason and evaluate reasons for beliefs and actions. Epistemological questions arise regarding what constitutes good reasoning and whether critical thinking is neutral or biased towards certain groups. 

Some argue that standard accounts of critical thinking favor dominant groups and devalue marginalized groups, questioning whether reason itself is a form of hegemony.

The idea of a "science of humanity" suggests a framework for understanding humanity as a symbolic and cultural phenomenon, distinct from biological or social sciences. Advancing humanity involves a complex interplay of technological, social, and scientific developments that have historically driven human progress. 

Posted in: Digitalization,Global Perspective,Research,Social Computing