Are right & wrong -subjective aspects of- how we-choose, decide, act, accordingly?Is there objective truth to -certain actions where -we can say- they are right or wrong, absolutely? Are there needs to -set the common criteria for- judging “right & wrong,”globally?
people debate-
People always look at-
the world,
the way-
they want it to be;
If anything not matching-
their way of -
thinking,
they consider -
it was wrong;
can you make-
sound judgment of
“right & wrong”
objectively?
The right or wrong are-
two polarities;
the problem of -
questionable RIGHT or WRONG comes,
when they are based on-
common beliefs, laws,
conventional understanding,
developed by human thinking,
subjectively.
Sometimes,
there is -
an obvious right or wrong solution to-
a problem -
you have;
but when someone else looks at -
it from -
their perspective,
they come up with -
different viewpoints.
Are there always-
gray space,
shadow in between,
philosophically?
Can we challenge, debate,
learn from-
each other through-
aspect of civil, respectful dialog,
insightfully?
We encounter events,
large or small,
on daily life;
the impact of -
our deeds is -
spread across-
primordial cycles of -
cause-effect,
pervasively..
Are we-
able to-
gain deep understanding from-
another point of view,
empathetically?
Shall we be flexible to-
share “right” things with others,
be open to “wrongs,”
inclusively?
Are right & wrong -
subjective aspects of-
how we-
choose,
decide,
act, accordingly?
Is there -
objective truth to -
certain actions,
what is right,
what is wrong,
in the long-lasting human history,
constantly;
do right & wrong mean -
accurate or inaccurate,
technically?
correct and incorrect,
morally?
good or bad,
ethically?
the world,
the way-
they want it to be;
If anything not matching-
their way of -
thinking,
they consider -
it was wrong;
can you make-
sound judgment of
“right & wrong”
objectively?
two polarities;
the problem of -
questionable RIGHT or WRONG comes,
when they are based on-
common beliefs, laws,
conventional understanding,
developed by human thinking,
subjectively.
Sometimes,
there is -
an obvious right or wrong solution to-
a problem -
you have;
but when someone else looks at -
it from -
their perspective,
they come up with -
different viewpoints.
Are there always-
gray space,
shadow in between,
philosophically?
Can we challenge, debate,
learn from-
each other through-
aspect of civil, respectful dialog,
insightfully?
large or small,
on daily life;
the impact of -
our deeds is -
spread across-
primordial cycles of -
cause-effect,
pervasively..
Are we-
able to-
gain deep understanding from-
another point of view,
empathetically?
Shall we be flexible to-
share “right” things with others,
be open to “wrongs,”
inclusively?
subjective aspects of-
how we-
choose,
decide,
act, accordingly?
Is there -
objective truth to -
certain actions,
in which-
we can say-
they are right or wrong,
absolutely?
Are there needs to-
set common criteria for-
judging “right & wrong,”
globally?
Is it a continuum of -
more right or more wrong in-
comparison to the alternatives,
substantially?
0 comments:
Post a Comment