The multiplier effect comes from deliberately composing people, incentives, processes, and portfolios so each mode complements the others rather than dominating.
There are three behavioral modes that appear in innovation teams and leaders:
-Obsessive — intense focus on a goal, significant detail, or vision; long attention span; relentless refinement.
-Compulsive — ritualized habits, process-driven repetition, and checklist discipline that ensure work gets done predictably.
-Responsive — adaptive, customer‑ or signal-driven adjustments; fast feedback and agility.
Strengths & contributions to innovation: All three can help or hurt innovation depending on how they’re balanced.
Obsessive: Deep domain mastery, vision persistence, ability to carry projects through long uncertainty, exceptional craft and product-market fit work. Such as: Breakthrough R&D, complex product/technical challenges, founder-led vision work.
Compulsive: Operational rigor, reproducibility, high-quality execution, risk control, and scaling discipline. Such as: Scaling pilots, regulatory compliance, reliable delivery, onboarding repeatable processes.
Responsive: Speed of learning, customer alignment, ability to pivot, short cycle experimentation. Such as Early validation, market-fit discovery, iterative product development, rapid adaptation to external shocks.
Failure modes & risks
-Obsessive Risk: Tunnel vision; ignoring market signals; over-optimizing for an internally coherent vision that customers don’t want; changes fatigue, burnout.
-Compulsive Risk: Bureaucracy and slow decision-making; stifling creativity; ritual over outcome; checklist-driven “box-ticking.”
Responsive Risk: Shallow solutions, lack of coherence, constant pivoting without scaling, chasing fad signals; lack of long-term betting.
How they interact (compositional dynamics)
Obsessive + Responsive = focused exploration: Obsession supplies sustained vision; responsiveness injects reality checks. This combo is powerful when visionaries accept iterative user feedback.
Obsessive + Compulsive = disciplined craftsmanship: Rigor converts deep insight into high-quality, reliable products—but tolerates less experimentation.
Compulsive + Responsive = scalable discovery: Processes and practices support rapid experiments repeatedly and safely; good for organizations that need many validated small bets.
All three balanced = creative durability: Vision + discipline + feedback enables big bets that can be iterated and scaled responsibly.
Organizational patterns to support each mode
-For Obsessive talent: Give autonomy, long time horizons, protected “innovation time” (20% time, research labs), and tolerance for failure. Provide deep mentorship, funding runway, and quiet focus environments.
-For Compulsive roles: Provide playbooks, checklists, compliance tooling, and clear escalation rules. Reward process improvements and operational excellence.
-For Responsive teams: Provide fast feedback infrastructure (instrumentation, user research), micro-grants for experiments, and short-cycle review cadences (weekly sprints, demo days).
Practical levers to balance the three modes
-Portfolio design: Allocate resources across horizon bets: 60% core, 30% adjacent, 10% exploratory. Match modes to horizons (compulsive for core, responsive for adjacent, obsessive for exploratory deep tech).
-Dual operating rhythms: Long-cycle cadences for deep work (quarterly/annual roadmaps) and short-cycle cadences for experiments (weekly demos, monthly validation gates).
-Role clarity & teaming: Compose teams deliberately: pair obsessive founders/lead engineers with compulsive program managers and responsive product researchers. Use T-shaped skill maps.
-Guardrails & exit rules: Define clear go/no-go criteria and timeboxes to prevent obsession from becoming sunk-cost bias or responsiveness from becoming perpetual pivoting.
-Demo & artifacts: Pre-mortems (compulsive), demo days (responsive), research sabbaticals (obsessive), public lesson boards (compulsive + responsive).
Incentives with Mix rewards: credit for validated learning (responsive), recognition for craftsmanship and long-term impact (obsessive), and bonuses for operational reliability (compulsive).
Hiring and development signals
-Obsessive indicators: deep portfolio work, sustained side projects, long-term research contributions, high depth of knowledge.
-Compulsive indicators: delivery track record, process design, documentation habits, incident post-mortem quality.
-Responsive indicators: rapid experiment velocity, user research artifacts, A/B testing success, cross-functional facilitation.
Development: rotate people through different modes (stretch assignments) to build balanced capability and empathy.
Simple diagnostics (quick assessment)
-Too obsessive? Signs: long projects with little external validation; frequent excuses for ignoring market feedback.
-Too compulsive? Signs: slow approvals, many checklists but poor outcomes, low experiment rate.
-Too responsive? Signs: high churn of directions, low scaling success, lack of coherent roadmap.
Use simple metrics:
Experiment velocity (responsive)
-Deployment & error rates (compulsive)
-Long-term impact ratio (obsessive — fraction of bets that yield strategic advantage over 2–5 years)
-Minimal playbook for leaders (30/90 day)
0–30 days
-Map team modes: who is obsessive/compulsive/responsive today?
-Identify major friction points ( obsessions blocked by process, experiments starved of rigor).
-Introduce one ritual: weekly demo + 1-page experiment log.
30–90 days
-Rebalance portfolio: ensure resource split across horizons.
-Pilot paired teams: obsessive lead + compulsive program manager + responsive researcher on 1–2 projects.
-Set clear go/no-go gates with metrics and timeboxes.
Cultural norms to cultivate
-Humble conviction: hold strong views but stay ready to update them with evidence.
-Practiced humility: regular pre-mortems and postmortems with psychological safety.
-Documentation culture: make obsession visible (research notes), make compulsion useful (playbooks), make responsiveness traceable (experiment logs).
-Reward cross-mode collaboration and learning swaps.
Obsessive, compulsive, and responsive modes each have essential roles in innovation. The multiplier effect comes from deliberately composing people, incentives, processes, and portfolios so each mode complements the others rather than dominating.
0 comments:
Post a Comment