Rising Ahead or Falling Behind

 In talent management, organizations must focus on rising ahead by fostering a culture of growth, engagement, and adaptability.

People are not just cost or even resources, but the human capital worth investing in a smart way. Global organizations should develop their customized talent management practices for rejuvenating creative energy, inspiring change. Rising Ahead or Falling Behind: Different organizations have different Talent Management perspectives and maturity.

Forward-looking organizations are Rising Ahead in Talent Development: 

-Continuous Learning and Development: Organizations that prioritize ongoing training and skill development create a workforce that is adaptable and prepared for future challenges. Investing in employee growth fosters loyalty and enhances performance.

-Data-Driven Decision Making: Leveraging analytics to track employee performance, engagement, and career progression allows organizations to make informed decisions. This approach helps identify high-potential employees and aligns talent with strategic goals.

-Diversity and Inclusion: Embracing a diverse workforce leads to innovative solutions and improved problem-solving. Companies that focus on inclusive talent management attract a wider range of perspectives, driving creativity and innovation.

-Employee Engagement: Fostering a positive workplace culture that values employee feedback and involvement can enhance engagement. Engaged employees are more productive and likely to stay with the organization, reducing turnover costs.

-Flexible Work Arrangements: Offering remote or hybrid work options can attract top talent and increase employee satisfaction. Flexibility in work arrangements supports work-life balance, leading to higher retention rates.

Some Organizations are Falling Behind in Talent Development: 

-Neglecting Talent Development: Organizations that fail to invest in employee development risk losing top talent. Without clear career paths and advancement opportunities, employees may seek growth elsewhere.

-Ignoring Employee Feedback: A lack of communication and responsiveness to employee concerns can lead to disengagement. Companies that disregard feedback may face higher turnover rates and a decline in morale.

-Inadequate Performance Management: Without effective performance management systems, organizations may struggle to identify and nurture talent. Poorly defined goals and evaluation processes can lead to frustration and decreased productivity.

-Homogeneity in Workforce: Failing to prioritize diversity can stifle innovation and limit the organization’s ability to connect with diverse markets. A lack of varied perspectives may hinder problem-solving and creativity.

-Resistance to Change: Organizations that are slow to adapt to new technologies and evolving workplace trends risk falling behind competitors. Embracing change is crucial for maintaining relevance in a rapidly shifting market.

In talent management, organizations must focus on rising ahead by fostering a culture of growth, engagement, and adaptability. Conversely, falling behind often results from neglecting these critical areas, leading to decreased performance and increased turnover. Prioritizing effective talent management strategies is essential for sustaining competitive advantage.

Read More

Scientific Criticism

 Scientific criticism is a rigorous process of evaluating scientific work to ensure its validity, reliability, and contribution to scientific knowledge. 

Constructive criticism aims to help improve by offering solutions. Scientific criticism involves evaluating scientific theories, methodologies, and findings using scientific principles and evidence.

Types of constructive criticism:

-Logical criticism - Examines the reasoning and arguments in a work.

-Aesthetic criticism - Evaluates beauty, style, and artistic merit.

-Positive criticism - Focuses on strengths and merits.

-Factual criticism - Assesses the accuracy of facts and information.

-Scientific criticism - Uses scientific methods to evaluate claims.

-Moral criticism - Judges based on moral/ethical standards.

Key principles of Science Criticism:

-Falsifiability of theories and hypotheses

-Reproducibility of results

-Peer review process

Advantages Scientific criticism:

-Ensure accuracy and reliability of scientific knowledge

-Encourage critical thinking and skepticism which leads to new discoveries and refinement of theories

Key features of Science Criticism:

-Assessment of empirical evidence supporting scientific theories

-Examination of methodologies and experimental designs

-Pursuit of improving scientific knowledge through critical evaluation

Disadvantages Scientific criticism:

-It can be time-consuming due to extensive research requirements

-It may lead to controversy and debate within the scientific community

-It requires a strong understanding of scientific methods and principles

Process:

-Identify the purpose and scope of the research

-Evaluate the methodology and design of the study

-Analyze the results and discussion

-Review references and citations

-Assess the structure and style of the writing

Science Criticism is crucial for ensuring consistency, predictability, and authenticity in scientific behavior. It helps to maintain high standards in scientific research and publications. It often combines with logical and factual criticism; focuses on quantitative values rather than moral values; it uses logic, relevant proof, experimentation, and experience

Scientific criticism is a rigorous process of evaluating scientific work to ensure its validity, reliability, and contribution to scientific knowledge. It plays a crucial role in the advancement of science by promoting accuracy, encouraging critical thinking, and fostering new discoveries.

Read More

Juxtaposition

The juxtaposition of liberty and security raises critical questions about governance, individual rights, and societal values.

Liberty refers to the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views. It encompasses civil liberties such as freedom of speech, assembly, and religion. Security involves the protection of individuals and communities from threats; it often requires government intervention and regulation to ensure safety. 

The juxtaposition of liberty and security is a longstanding and complex debate in political philosophy, law, and public policy. 

The idea that liberty and security exist in a delicate balance is pervasive in political discourse. Many argue that enhancing security measures often comes at the expense of individual freedoms. Conversely, proponents of increased liberty may argue that excessive security measures can lead to oppression and a loss of fundamental rights.

The juxtaposition of liberty and security raises critical questions about governance, individual rights, and societal values. It challenges policymakers to find a balance that ensures safety while preserving essential freedoms. As societies evolve and face new threats, this debate will likely continue to be a central theme in discussions about rights, responsibilities, and the role of government in protecting citizens.

Read More

Assessment of Argument

Evaluative arguments are essential for making informed judgments about various subjects in both personal and professional contexts.

Evaluative arguments are a specific type of argument that assesses the quality or effectiveness of a subject based on established criteria. They are commonly used in various contexts, including academic writing, professional assessments, and everyday discussions.

Evaluative arguments make claims about how good or bad something is, essentially answering the question, "How does this measure up?" They often involve a judgment about a subject based on specific criteria.

Criteria Establishment: Evaluative arguments require the establishment of clear criteria against which the subject will be evaluated. These criteria can be moral, aesthetic, functional, or based on effectiveness. For example, when evaluating a restaurant, one might consider criteria such as food quality, service speed, and ambiance.

Judgment Articulation: After defining the criteria, the argument must articulate a judgment about how well the subject meets these standards. This involves making a claim that reflects this assessment. For instance, one might argue that a particular film is excellent because it excels in storytelling and character development.

Evidence Support: Evaluative arguments should provide evidence to support the claims made regarding how well the subject meets the established criteria. This evidence can include statistics, expert opinions, examples, and anecdotes. For example, to evaluate a school program's effectiveness, one might present data on student performance improvements as evidence.

Types of Criteria: Evaluative arguments can be classified based on the types of criteria used:

-Moral Criteria: Focus on ethical standards or values (e.g., Is a policy fair?).

-Aesthetic Criteria: Concerned with beauty or artistic value (e.g., Is this painting visually appealing?).

-Functional Criteria: Related to practicality and effectiveness (e.g., Does this software meet user needs?).

Examples of Evaluative Arguments

-Workplace Evaluation: "Our employer treats us fairly based on industry standards for employee compensation and benefits."

-Product Review: "The new smartphone model is superior due to its battery life and camera quality compared to its predecessor."

-Public Policy Assessment: "The tuition-free program at City College is successful because it has increased enrollment rates and improved community access to education."

Evaluative arguments are essential for making informed judgments about various subjects in both personal and professional contexts. By establishing clear criteria, articulating judgments, and providing supporting evidence, individuals can effectively communicate their evaluations and persuade others regarding their assessments. This structured approach not only enhances clarity but also fosters critical thinking in discussions about quality and effectiveness.

Read More

Argument

 While all three perspectives—logical, dialectical, and rhetorical—contribute valuable insights into argument evaluation, they do so from different angles.

An argument seeks to change a concept, perspectives, ideas and provoke actions, with or without a final satisfying outcome. The evaluation of arguments can be approached from three distinct perspectives: logical, dialectical, and rhetorical. Each perspective offers unique criteria and focuses on different aspects of argumentation. 

Logical Perspective: The logical perspective emphasizes the structure and validity of arguments. It evaluates arguments based on formal rules of reasoning, ensuring that conclusions logically follow from premises.

Criteria: This perspective assesses:

-Validity: Whether the argument's structure guarantees the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true.

-Soundness: Whether the premises are actually true, in addition to being valid.

Application: Commonly used in mathematical proofs, scientific reasoning, and formal debates where rigorous standards of truth and inference are required.

Dialectical Perspective: The dialectical perspective centers on the process of dialogue and discussion aimed at resolving disagreements or uncovering truths through reasoned debate.

Criteria: This approach evaluates:

-Engagement: How well participants engage with each other's arguments and counterarguments.

-Sufficiency: Whether all relevant viewpoints and evidence have been considered in the discussion.

-Critical Examination: The extent to which opposing views are critically assessed and addressed.

-Application: Often applied in contexts where multiple viewpoints are explored, such as philosophical debates or conflict resolution scenarios.

Rhetorical Perspective: The rhetorical perspective emphasizes persuasion and the effectiveness of communication in influencing an audience. It considers how arguments are constructed and presented to achieve persuasive goals.

Criteria: This perspective assesses:

-Persuasiveness: How effectively an argument convinces its audience.

-Contextual Relevance: The appropriateness of the argument in relation to the audience's values, beliefs, and emotions.

-Delivery: The style and manner in which arguments are presented, including appeals to ethos (credibility), pathos (emotion), and logos (logic).

-Application: Commonly used in marketing, political speeches, and any situation where influencing an audience is paramount.

While all three perspectives—logical, dialectical, and rhetorical—contribute valuable insights into argument evaluation, they do so from different angles. The logical perspective prioritizes validity and soundness; the dialectical perspective focuses on collaborative truth-seeking; and the rhetorical perspective emphasizes persuasive effectiveness. Understanding these differences allows for a more nuanced approach to evaluating arguments across various contexts.

Read More

Pros&ConsofRhetoric

 Rhetoric articulation is a powerful tool for communication, offering significant advantages in persuasion. However, it also carries risks. 

Rhetoric is the art of persuasive communication, influencing how ideas are expressed and received. Its influence spans various fields, including politics, marketing, education, and everyday conversations. Here are the pros and cons of rhetoric articulation:

Pros of Rhetoric Articulation

Persuasive Communication: Enhance the ability to persuade and influence others effectively.

Example: Effective speeches can inspire action or change opinions.

Clarity of Ideas: It helps to clarify complex ideas and present them in an understandable manner. Using structured arguments makes it easier for the audience to follow.

Emotional Engagement: Connect with audiences on an emotional level, making messages more impactful. Example: Stories and vivid language can evoke empathy and resonate with listeners.

Cultural Resonance: Reflects and reinforces cultural values, making communication more relatable. Example: References to shared experiences can strengthen community bonds.

Critical Thinking: Encourages critical analysis of arguments and helps audiences evaluate information. Example: Understanding rhetorical techniques aids in discerning bias and manipulation.

Cons of Rhetoric Articulation

Oversimplification: Complex issues may be oversimplified to fit persuasive narratives. Example: Nuanced topics can lose depth when presented as black-and-white arguments.

Polarization: Rhetoric can contribute to divisiveness by framing issues in a way that alienates opposing viewpoints. Example: "Us vs. Them" rhetoric can deepen societal divides.

Manipulation Risks: Rhetoric expression can be used to manipulate or deceive audiences through emotional appeals without factual backing. Example: Misleading arguments can exploit fears or prejudices.

Superficial Engagement: Audiences may focus more on style than substance, leading to a lack of genuine understanding. Example: Charismatic speakers may overshadow important content with delivery.

Ethical Concerns: The power of rhetoric raises ethical questions about responsibility in communication. Example: Speakers may prioritize persuasion over truth, compromising integrity.

Rhetoric articulation is a powerful tool for communication, offering significant advantages in persuasion. However, it also carries risks, including manipulation and oversimplification. Balancing these pros and cons is essential for effective and ethical communication.

Read More

TechniqueofDebating

The debate, when used properly, can be a way to explore critical thinking from a non-biased perspective. 

Debating is a style of critical thinking activity: In order to win the debate, you would need to know more about your opponent and you would need to plan tactics and strategies to win the debate which would require applied critical thinking in order to discover and execute these things. There are some debate techniques that can be applied in real-world debates and discussions:

Logical Reasoning and Argumentation Structures: Use deductive, inductive, reasoning to construct well-structured arguments.

Use techniques (claim, warrant, data, backing, rebuttal) to organize arguments. Identify and avoid logical fallacies, such as hasty generalizations, and false cause.

Rhetorical Strategies: Leverage persuasive language and rhetorical devices, such as appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos. Use framing, analogies, and metaphors to present arguments in compelling ways.

Engage in active listening and responsive questioning to understand and address the opponent's points.

-Cross-Examination and Refutation:

-Anticipate and prepare for counterarguments by identifying potential weaknesses or gaps in your own position.

-Use strategic questioning to expose flaws, inconsistencies, or contradictions in the opponent's arguments.

-Refute arguments by providing counterevidence, challenging assumptions, or highlighting logical inconsistencies.

Concession and Acknowledgment: Demonstrate intellectual humility by acknowledging the validity of the opponent's points or conceding when appropriate. This can help build trust, foster a more constructive dialogue, and avoid appearing defensive or dogmatic.

Reframing and Perspective Shifting: Reframe the debate by shifting the focus or introducing new angles or considerations. Encourage participants to consider alternative perspectives, which can lead to more nuanced and balanced discussions.

Use of Evidence and Sources: Strengthen arguments by incorporating credible, well-researched, and up-to-date evidence from reliable sources. Effectively cite and contextualize evidence to demonstrate its relevance and significance.

Improvisation: Be prepared to adapt and respond to unexpected developments or shifting dynamics during the debate. Maintain composure and think on your feet to address new challenges or unexpected points raised by the opponent.

Time Management and Structure: Effectively manage the time allocated for the debate, ensuring a balanced and organized flow of arguments. Adhere to time limits, opening and closing statements, and any other structural requirements to maintain a disciplined and focused discussion.

The debate, when used properly, can be a way to explore critical thinking from a non-biased perspective. By incorporating these diverse debate techniques, participants can enhance their ability to engage in constructive, persuasive, and intellectually rigorous discussions on a wide range of issues. Remember, the choice and application of these techniques may vary depending on the specific context, audience, and the nature of the debate itself.

Read More

Good Competition Bad Competition

 Good competition encourages progressive changes; while unprofessional competition is often based on negative emotions and actions to hurt humanity.

In nature, competition is for evolution, in business, competition is for surviving and thriving. Competition is part of the natural dynamics of life. We humans are developing, and growing, and competition and choice are part of that process.

However, there is good competition and bad competition. Here are some ways to promote healthy competition instead of unhealthy rivalry:

Foster a Collaborative Environment: Encourage a culture of mutual support and shared learning among competitors. Organize opportunities for participants to share knowledge, techniques, and insights with one another. Emphasize the value of collective growth and development rather than individual dominance, otherwise, bad competition would generate a negative culture and hurt the business's long-term performance. 

Shift the Focus to Personal Improvement: Encourage competitors to set personalized goals and measure their progress against their own previous achievements. Celebrate incremental improvements and milestones, rather than solely emphasizing the final outcome. Foster a mindset of personal growth and self-betterment, rather than comparing oneself to others casually. Otherwise, bad competition would decrease value, and encourage unfairness and mediocrity.

Promote Constructive Feedback: Establish a system where competitors can receive meaningful, constructive feedback from judges and mentors. Ensure feedback focuses on areas for improvement and development, rather than negative criticism or personal attacks. Encourage competitors to view feedback as an opportunity to enhance their skills and abilities.

Recognize Diverse Strengths: Acknowledge that individuals may excel in different areas and have unique talents. Celebrate the diversity of skills and perspectives within the competition, rather than trying to rank them against a single standard. Emphasize the value that each competitor brings to the overall event or community. Break down the “one size fits all” approach or the “me too” type of mentality and attitude. 

Foster Supportive Atmosphere: Encourage competitors to congratulate one another on achievements and support each other's successes. Discourage negative mentality or misconduct, such as disparaging comments, sabotage, or undermining others. Model and reinforce the importance of integrity, respect, and graciousness in the face of both win-and-lose situations.

Provide Mentorship and Guidance: Offer opportunities for experienced participants to mentor and guide newer or less experienced competitors. Facilitate peer-to-peer learning and knowledge-sharing sessions to foster a sense of community and shared growth, to ensure that mentors focus on nurturing talent and providing constructive support, rather than engaging in cutthroat competition.

Emphasize the Importance of the Process: Remind competitors that the true value lies in the journey of honing their skills and expressing their passion. Encourage a celebratory atmosphere that highlights the excitement and fulfillment of the creative process, rather than solely the end result. Foster an environment where participants can find joy and satisfaction in their own personal growth and development, rather than setting tricks on competitors and letting good people suffer.

Good competition encourages progressive changes; while unprofessional competition is often based on negative emotions and actions to damage humanity. By implementing these strategies, competition can be transformed from a zero-sum game of rivalry into a collaborative and supportive environment that nurtures talent, fosters personal growth, and celebrates the shared pursuit of excellence.

Read More

Itinvestigation

 IT leaders as “Chief Investigation Officer” need to enhance their management discipline, clarify their assumptions about something wrong, limiting, or not working in some way that requires 'fixing'; digging into root causes of problems.

Information technology plays a significant role in innovation and business transformation. IT captures organizational knowledge to continuously improve performance, develops the IT based business competencies needed for successful business solution delivery. 

IT failure can cause business failures and customer pains. Insightful leaders ask a series of questions to investigate the big “WHY” of IT initiative failures, fix relevant issues, build up the better standard with necessary flexibility in order to improve their organizational agility, performance and resilience.

Investigate beyond the surface of problems: Oftentimes, IT organizations are perceived as a support center only by business partners, they are overloaded, spend the majority of time and energy on fixing symptoms, but the real issues continue getting back. They didn’t contribute enough to generating business value and delight customers. When IT systems are dysfunctional, its value proposition fails to be translated into meaningful operational deliverables; IT incompetence perhaps further causes serious business problems. IT management needs to make a deep investigation of real issues underneath by communicating cross-functionally, and solving problems cross-disciplinarily.

IT failure is caused by the management of IT rather than just IT management. The breadth and depth of IT management include people, process, organizational structure design, and technology update. You can only manage what you measure. The wrong metrics selection or ineffective measurement practices perhaps mislead or cause management conflicts or resource misalignment. IT is an integral part of the business, investigate IT from technical, economical, innovation lens, improve IT agility and value creation.

Investigate IT-enabled business solutions: To break down the “we always do things like that,” mentality, improve IT reputation from a cost center to a value creator and an innovation hub. IT management needs to assess IT staff's professional capability, IT capacity and IT vendors’ overall competency. Always investigate the better ways to do things, particularly when you look at a situation and wonder how to understand the real problems and set choices to solve them innovatively otherwise, there's a great danger that the new "better" solution will fail because it runs straight into the same underlying factors that brought about the old state.

Businesses are looking for IT to add new innovative methods for management of complexity, develop the next practice for business transformation. IT management should handle investigations of innovative business solutions, to change the business’s perception, and reinvent IT by developing their people, evaluating and recognizing their innovative vendors and partners. IT can provide tailored solutions to not only fix the specific problems but also optimize the underlying functions or processes to develop competitive advantage.

Investigate hidden cost, risks, or gray area: Information technology permeates everywhere in the organizations. There'll need to be more IT involvement, not less for solving complex issues. To “just go ahead and fix it” carries assumptions, investigate hidden costs to improve operation excellence; investigate gray areas to enforce GRC. So the question boils down to figuring out the cost/benefits matrix of correcting or not correcting outputs and what cost/benefits factors get internalized, enabling IT management to improve their organization effectively.

Business opportunities and risks are co-existing in the organizations nowadays. In fact, every opportunity has risks embedded in it; and every risk perhaps brings opportunities as well. Strategic risks possibly cause fatal business failures for the long run. Do the cause-effect analysis thoroughly. If you don't understand all the causes, or most of the causes of the situation and also the context of the situation, then intervention may be worse than non-intervention.

IT leaders as “Chief Investigation Officer” need to enhance their management discipline, clarify their assumptions about something wrong, limiting, or not working in some way that requires 'fixing'; digging into root causes of problems, rather than seeing the symptom on the surface, keeping the end in mind, to ensure IT is strategically positioned to be ahead of where the business is moving next, understand the real-world business problems deeply and run a high performance organization.

Read More

Initiatelogicalargument

Debating is not for stimulating conflicts, but for brainstorming better ways to do things.

Due to the changing nature of technology, IT leadership roles also continue to involve & shift the focus, to move up the maturity level. More and more CIOs are requested to take more responsibility and many CIOs present the breadth of leadership competency.

The proactive IT debates help IT leaders to brainstorm better ways to do things and improve management capabilities. Here are the monthly CIO debates collections about envisioning digital IT leadership and running high-performance digital IT organizations.

                   

Initiate Logical Argument

Initiatelogicalargument The world is still full of arguments artistically, scientifically, economically, politically, and religiously. An argument with clarified logic underneath seeks to change a concept, perspectives, ideas, intended to persuade and provoke actions, with or without a final satisfying outcome! There is some logic underneath the augments.

Initiate Arguments to Open One’s Mind An argument seeks to change a concept, perspective, idea, and provoke action. With or without a final satisfying outcome! Some ideas may be worth spreading. The argument is an investment of time, by two contrasting sparks, positive vs. negative, right vs. wrong, good vs. bad, etc. Are there benefits of conflict? If so under what circumstance? In what arena? Thought? Communication? Is our necessity for agreement rooted in egocentrism. Or is dialog more effective when contrasted with opposing views? Can making arguments help open one’s mind?

Insight of Good, Bad, and Ugly of Argument The argument is “an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one; a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or idea is right or wrong.” (dictionary.com). The world is still full of arguments geographically, scientifically, economically, politically, and religiously. Is the argument healthy or toxic? What's the good, bad, and ugly perspective of argument?

Illuminateparadoxicallogic Our world becomes over complex with blurred territories and overwhelming growth of information. The paradox is the result of two opposing truths existing side by side, which can be both right.

Can you Make a Leap of IT Digital Transformation via Healthy Debating Due to the exponential growth of information and disruptive nature of digital technologies, IT is at the crossroad: Should IT continue to be run as an “isolated function,” just keep the lights on, and gradually become irrelevant? Or should IT reinvent itself to become the change agent of the business? It is the time to reimagine IT via inspiring critical and creative thinking and spurring healthy debating. Because debating is a type of critical thinking activity. Critical thinking is a basic form of organized thought specifically used to frame the right questions, identify the real problems, and discover better ways to do things.

The “Future of CIO” Blog has reached 7 million page views with 9300+ blog postings in 59+ different categories of leadership, management, strategy, digitalization, change/talent, etc. blog posting. The content richness is not for its own sake, but to convey the vision and share the wisdom. Blogging is not about writing, but about thinking and innovating new ideas; it’s not just about WHAT to say, but about WHY to say, and HOW to say it. It reflects the color and shade of your thought patterns, and it indicates the peaks and curves of your thinking waves. Unlike pure entertainment, quality and professional content takes time for digesting, contemplation and engaging, and therefore, it takes time to attract the "hungry minds" and the "deep souls." It’s the journey to amplify diverse voices and deepen digital footprints, and it's the way to harness your innovative spirit.

Amazon Book Order List

B&N Nook Book Order List

Apple iBook Order List

Google Book Order List


Introduction

Chapter 1 Digital IT Leadership Q&A

Chapter 2 Digital IT Fitness Q&A


Chapter 3 Digital IT Innovation Paradox Q&As


Chapter 4 Digital IT Management Dilemmas

Chapter 5 Digital IT Potential Q&As

Chapter 6 Digital IT Priority Q&As

Chapter 7 IT-Business Gap Q&As

Chapter 8 Digital IT Performance Q&As

Chapter 9 IT Branding Q&As

Chapter 10: Digital IT Talent Management Q&As

Read More

Isitinfluential

Debating is not for stimulating conflicts, but for brainstorming better ways to do things.

Due to the changing nature of technology, IT leadership roles also continue to involve & shift the focus, to move up the maturity level. More and more CIOs are requested to take more responsibility and many CIOs present the breadth of leadership competency. 

The proactive IT debates help IT leaders to brainstorm better ways to do things and improve management capabilities. Here are the monthly CIO debates collections about envisioning digital IT leadership and running high-performance digital IT organizations.

                    Is IT Influential

Is IT Reaching the Inflection Point of Digital Transformation Yet With disruptive digital technologies and fast growth of information, forward-thinking IT organizations are also speeding up for digital transformation, as well as becoming the change agent for the entire company. The emergence of potential opportunities for exploring digitization is likely to follow a nonlinear pattern with exponential speed, as the pervasiveness of an organization's digitization journey increases. So, is IT reaching the inflection point of digital transformation yet, and how to ensure it is in the right direction for improving its effectiveness, responsiveness and maturity?

Is IT a Change Agent In the industrial age, IT is often perceived as the department which is slow to change, acts as a controller only, and gets stuck at the lower level of maturity. However, nowadays, with increasing speed of change and exponential growth of information, IT is like the business's digital engine, CIOs are accountable for a critical part of the business that is constantly changing and evolving and IT is also in a position to dig through underlying functions and processes of the businesses. Therefore, it is imperative to speed up IT and run it as a change organization of the business for accelerating digital transformation.

IT Transformation Debate: When Should IT Lead, When Should IT Follow More often than not, technology is the catalyst for driving business change and digital transformation, however, in most of the companies, IT is still perceived as an order taker and support function, and most IT organizations get stuck at the lower level of maturity for functional alignment or enabler. So IT is at a crossroad: Shall IT lead or follow? Should IT leadership rock the boat or just keep it afloat? And how to run digital IT at high speed and agility?

Is IT Organization a “Magic” or a Trendsetter? IT plays a critical role in modern businesses today, however, most business leaders and professionals lack the in-depth understanding of IT organizations, oftentimes, the “magic” thinking of IT is one of the root causes to divide business and IT and create gaps for the digital transformation. In practice, a digital IT organization needs to become an integral part of the high mature digital company, to gain competitive advantage or differentiated capability for the business’s growth. To improve IT maturity, CIOs should ask themselves: Are you running an IT organization as a “Magic,” or a “trendsetter”?

IT Personalization: How to Run Digital IT with Differentiated Advantage IT is always at the center of change. The emergence of potential opportunities for exploiting digitization is likely to follow a nonlinear pattern at exponential speed, as the pervasiveness of an organization’s digitization journey increases. IT can no longer just “keep the lights on,” IT leaders need to think strategically and creatively about alternative solutions and ask themselves tough questions about how to personalize IT to gain differentiated business competency.

The “Future of CIO” Blog has reached 7 million page views with 9300+ blog postings in 59+ different categories of leadership, management, strategy, digitalization, change/talent, etc. blog posting. The content richness is not for its own sake, but to convey the vision and share the wisdom. Blogging is not about writing, but about thinking and innovating new ideas; it’s not just about WHAT to say, but about WHY to say, and HOW to say it. It reflects the color and shade of your thought patterns, and it indicates the peaks and curves of your thinking waves. Unlike pure entertainment, quality and professional content takes time for digesting, contemplation and engaging, and therefore, it takes time to attract the "hungry minds" and the "deep souls." It’s the journey to amplify diverse voices and deepen digital footprints, and it's the way to harness your innovative spirit.

Amazon Book Order List

B&N Nook Book Order List

Apple iBook Order List

Google Book Order List


Introduction

Chapter 1 Digital IT Leadership Q&A

Chapter 2 Digital IT Fitness Q&A


Chapter 3 Digital IT Innovation Paradox Q&As


Chapter 4 Digital IT Management Dilemmas

Chapter 5 Digital IT Potential Q&As

Chapter 6 Digital IT Priority Q&As

Chapter 7 IT-Business Gap Q&As

Chapter 8 Digital IT Performance Q&As

Chapter 9 IT Branding Q&As

Chapter 10: Digital IT Talent Management Q&As

Read More