It’s always crucial to know that understanding requires truth, justification, or other conditions typically associated with knowledge.
Understanding is seen as an important complement to knowledge in epistemology, with some arguing it deserves more attention as an epistemic good. Understanding is considered an important epistemic accomplishment, distinct from knowledge.
Philosophers viewed understanding (episteme) as a high-grade epistemic achievement involving grasping fundamental principles or elements of reality. In contemporary usage, understanding is often ascribed more broadly, even to relatively simple cases. Objectual understanding refers to grasping coherence-making relations between propositions in a subject matter. This is considered particularly valuable epistemically.
Understanding wider subject matters tends to be more cognitively demanding as it requires grasping connections between more propositions. Central to understanding are coherence-like elements - grasping explanatory and conceptual connections between pieces of information. Understanding involves both subjective elements (the mental act of grasping connections) and objective epistemic elements (the actual coherence relations).
Some philosophers argue understanding is distinctively valuable from an epistemic perspective, more so than knowledge. It’s always crucial to know that understanding requires truth, justification, or other conditions typically associated with knowledge.
0 comments:
Post a Comment