EA assessment needs to
have a clear purpose first, is it for evaluating EA, or EITA, if it's at
logical or implementation level maturity, or is it for evaluating IT maturity
(IT infrastructure, application, asset management., etc), or it's for setting
up governance framework., etc. Either case, you may invite some customers
outside EA team, and listen to different perspectives, at the tactical level, KPIs
may bring some insight, however, the issues are: many organizations may lack the "right" set of KPIs in their IT or EA to bring the insight for
objective assessment. Prepare Architectural assessment checklist based on
the objective of the exercise
-Collect initial data through an automated process
-Then engage and interview stakeholders based on the checklist.
-Collect initial data through an automated process
-Then engage and interview stakeholders based on the checklist.
Beginning the end in
mind: EA is about how to encompass organization from as-is state to future
state, so beginning the end in mind is important; also assess things matter to
improve the business's unique capabilities, both from strategic and operational
perspectives. Following the logic steps in EA assessment, and the
checklist responses would be weighted and would give you an idea of the
maturity:
Step 1: Determine the Intended Use of Architecture
Step 2: Determine Scope of Architecture
Step 3: Determine Data Required to Support Architecture Development
Step 4: Collect, Organize, Correlate, and Store Architectural Data
Step 5: Conduct Analyses in Support of Architecture Objectives
Step 6: Document Results in Accordance with Decision-Maker Needs
Step 3: Determine Data Required to Support Architecture Development
Step 4: Collect, Organize, Correlate, and Store Architectural Data
Step 5: Conduct Analyses in Support of Architecture Objectives
Step 6: Document Results in Accordance with Decision-Maker Needs
Governance is the key
throughout all aspects to help people know what success and 'right' looks like. Without internal recognition and sanctioning of a particular architectural approach,
there seems to be a great deal of philosophy and metaphysical IT-type debate. The
systematic assessment can describe a method for assessment in terms of a set of
building blocks
-show how the building blocks fit together
-contain a set of tools
-provide a common vocabulary
-include a list of recommended standards
-include a list of compliant products that can be used to implement the building blocks
-show how the building blocks fit together
-contain a set of tools
-provide a common vocabulary
-include a list of recommended standards
-include a list of compliant products that can be used to implement the building blocks
0 comments:
Post a Comment