Digital leaders and professionals need to develop critical thinking skills for making logical reasoning and practicing multidisciplinary approaches to solving complex problems step-wisely.
The logic was discovered, much as we discover mathematical truths. Logic is often nonlinear and multidimensional in today’s “VUCA” world. The main types of logical reasoning are deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning.
Multidimensional reasoning is a versatile concept that enhances understanding and decision-making by considering multiple facets of a problem or situation across various domains.
Deductive Reasoning: This involves drawing conclusions that are logically guaranteed by the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Deductive reasoning includes forms such as conditional reasoning, where conclusions are drawn from "if...then" propositions, and syllogisms, which are arguments with two premises leading to a conclusion. Valid forms of deductive reasoning include modus ponens and modus tollens. (Modus Ponens confirms the truth of the consequent based on the truth of the antecedent. Modus Tollens denies the truth of the antecedent based on the falsity of the consequent.)
Inductive Reasoning: This involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. Unlike deduction, inductive reasoning does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion but rather suggests that it is probable. Types of inductive reasoning include causal inference, categorical inference, and reasoning by analogy. Inductive reasoning is often used in problem-solving and involves making predictions or generalizations based on observed patterns.
The primary difference between deductive and inductive reasoning lies in the nature of the conclusions they produce from given premises.
-Deductive Reasoning: Deductive reasoning involves drawing conclusions that are logically certain, provided the premises are true. It is characterized by the fact that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. This form of reasoning is often used in mathematics and formal logic, where conclusions are derived from a set of axioms or established truths.
-Inductive Reasoning: Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves drawing conclusions that are probable but not guaranteed by the premises. It is used to make generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. Inductive reasoning is common in scientific inquiry, where data is collected to develop models or theories that predict future outcomes.
To deal with varying issues and circumstances with uncertainty, it’s important to take the cross-logical approach to analyze, synthesize, make objective perceptions, and interpret without “getting lost in interpretation.” Digital leaders and professionals need to develop critical thinking skills for making logical reasoning and practicing multidisciplinary approaches to solving complex problems step-wisely.
0 comments:
Post a Comment