Resilience aims to withstand volatility and uncertainty. Anti-fragility thrives on volatility, randomness, and disorder.
By recognizing the value of stressors and volatility, individuals and organizations can cultivate environments that promote growth and business agility in the face of uncertainty. here are the key differences between anti-fragility and resilience.
Nature of change: Resilience: Focus on maintaining stability and resisting change. Anti-fragility: Embraces change and uses it as an opportunity for growth.
Metaphor: Resilience is like a spring that returns to its original shape after being compressed. Anti-fragility is like the mythical Hydra that grows two heads when one is cut off.
Response to stress: Resilience: Allow a system to recover and return to its original state after stress or shock. Anti-fragility: Enable a system to actually improve and become stronger as a result of stress or shock.
Adaptation: Resilience: Involve adapting to return to a baseline. Anti-fragility: Involve adapting to surpass the previous baseline and reach a better state.
Outcome: Resilience: The system stays the same or bounces back to where it was before. Anti-fragility: The system gets better and ends up stronger than before.
Resilience aims to withstand volatility and uncertainty. Anti-fragility thrives on volatility, randomness, and disorder. In essence, while resilience is about bouncing back, anti-fragility is about bouncing forward and becoming stronger, to gain capability and improve from failures or stressors. Anti-fragility goes beyond resilience by not just resisting shocks but actively benefiting from them.
0 comments:
Post a Comment