In an Abilene paradox, a group of people collectively decide on a course of action that is counter to the preferences of many or all of the individuals in the group.
2 As leaders, we facilitate eliciting the views if they don't think of them on their own. Some people contribute better one on one, and others can handle group debate effectively.
3 In an Abilene paradox, a group of people collectively decide on a course of action that is counter to the preferences of many or all of the individuals in the group.
4 Why is it human nature to go along with what we believe the rest of the group wants to do without taking the time to actually check out if we are all taking a trip to Abilene?
5 Some people contribute better one on one, and others are better at group work effectively.
6 You'd think that a group would tend to democratize the diversified viewpoint and to moderate individual points of view. From the variety of industry studies, group polarization means that a group of people can make a more extreme decision than an individual.
7 Everything has two sides, though the good intention of such group thinking is to avoid conflict and be compliant to the team or business leadership.
0 comments:
Post a Comment